YOUR AD HERE — REACH DISCERNING READERS OF SERIOUS JOURNALISM
Rates upon inquiry. Clowns extra.
COURTS✒ EDITORIALABSURDITY:
Adobe back on the hook over subscription plan terms
Filed 11h ago · Via Courthouse News · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Miri's Magic Dance
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Themightyquill · CC BY-SA 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
A federal magistrate judge revived a class action against Adobe over its subscription renewal terms, reversing his own earlier dismissal of the case. Judge Nathanael Cousins ruled that Adobe waived its right to compel arbitration by continuing to fight the case in court and asking a judge, rather than an arbitrator, to decide procedural questions.
The ruling describes Adobe's early-termination clause, which charges a lump sum of 50% of a remaining annual contract if a user cancels after 14 days, as disclosed only through a link during final checkout. Cousins wrote that the cancellation process is 'designed to be confusing and frustrating.' Claims for conversion, unjust enrichment, and negligent misrepresentation will proceed, though the class cannot seek injunctive relief or disgorgement.
Attorneys for both sides did not respond to requests for comment.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.
✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
A company that builds software for a living wrote a cancellation process a judge says is designed to confuse people, and then argued in court that the same contract required arbitration it didn't actually want to use. That is the kind of contradiction that gives lawyers steady work. The next time a subscription renews itself without asking, remember somebody drafted that on purpose.