YOUR AD HERE — REACH DISCERNING READERS OF SERIOUS JOURNALISM
Rates upon inquiry. Clowns extra.
CULTURE✒ EDITORIALABSURDITY:
AI behaves more like a brain than a database – cognitive science’s role in its origin story helps explain why
Filed 1h ago · Via The Conversation · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
As I Figure
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Rjcastillo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
Cognitive scientists trace modern AI's roots to psychologists like Frank Rosenblatt and Donald Hebb, who modeled machines on brains rather than rulebooks, and later to Rumelhart, Hinton and Williams, who built the multilayer networks behind today's deep learning.
The authors argue this history matters because people still imagine AI as a database that looks up facts, when it actually behaves more like reconstructive human memory, prone to filling gaps with plausible nonsense, same as people misremembering a Tuesday.
That reframing is offered to explain why chatbots hallucinate and give inconsistent answers to the same question: they were never built to retrieve, only to generalize from examples.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.
✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
Call it a brain if you want, but a brain that confidently invents facts and never admits it was guessing would get fired from most jobs that matter. Knowing where the technology came from is nice history. It does not change what happens when the thing tells you something false with total confidence at two in the morning.