YOUR AD HERE — REACH DISCERNING READERS OF SERIOUS JOURNALISM
Rates upon inquiry. Clowns extra.
COURTS✒ EDITORIALABSURDITY:
Seventh Circuit raises eyebrows at challenge to Illinois labor law
Filed 2h ago · Via Courthouse News · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Investigations
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Great Brightstar · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
A Seventh Circuit panel spent Friday poking holes in a challenge to Illinois' ban on mandatory anti-union ‘captive audience’ meetings, questioning both whether the state labor director even has enforcement power and whether anyone has actually been harmed yet. Attorney Jeffrey Schwab, representing a think tank and trade association, could not name a single worker who had refused to attend such a meeting.
Judge Frank Easterbrook repeatedly pressed on the absence of injury, noting the case looked like preenforcement litigation resting on ‘so many what-if questions.’ The state's assistant attorney general argued the director's authority is merely ministerial and that the law's ambiguity is a matter for state courts, not federal ones, an argument Judge Ripple seemed inclined to entertain.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.
✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
Suing over a law before anybody has actually been hurt by it is a bit like calling the fire department because your neighbor bought a grill. The judges here seem to have noticed that the fire hasn't started, the grill hasn't been lit, and nobody's even bought charcoal yet. Federal courts have better things to do than referee hypotheticals dressed up as emergencies.