YOUR AD HERE — REACH DISCERNING READERS OF SERIOUS JOURNALISM
Rates upon inquiry. Clowns extra.
CULTURE✒ EDITORIALABSURDITY:
What the law says about armed officers at polling places
Filed 1h ago · Via The Conversation · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Miri's Magic Dance
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Wing1990hk · CC BY 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
Amid Trump administration suggestions that armed officers might appear at midterm polling places, a University of Wisconsin legal scholar lays out that federal law already bars federal troops and armed officers from polling places, with state laws typically layering on further restrictions and intimidation bans. Civil rights groups and unions have sued to block any such deployment, citing a climate of fear among voters.
The piece also covers ballot chain-of-custody law, pointing to a Riverside County, California case where a sheriff seized hundreds of thousands of ballots over unproven anomaly claims, an action the California Supreme Court found unlawful.
Voters who spot armed officials are advised to alert election officials immediately and document what they see.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.
✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
When the law is this unambiguous and officials still float the idea out loud, the point isn't confusion, it's testing how loud the pushback gets. A sheriff grabbing a truckload of ballots and losing in court should have settled the matter already. Instead here we are, reading the same statute out loud again before an election that hasn't even happened yet.