VOL. I · NO. 8572THURSDAY, AUGUST 20, 2026
The Daily Buffoon
WORLD ✒ EDITORIAL ABSURDITY: 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Nepal pushes for hydropower in protected areas through legal grey area

Filed 6d ago · Via Mongabay · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Duet Musette
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: World Travel & Tourism Council · CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

Nepal's Supreme Court ruled in January 2025 that a 2024 amendment opening protected areas to commercial development was invalid, citing constitutional environmental protections and intergenerational equity. More than a year later, the court still has not published the full text of that ruling, and in the gap the government has issued permits for ten private hydropower projects covering roughly 85 hectares of forest inside the Kanchanjangha, Gaurishankar and Annapurna protected areas and the buffer zones of Makalu Barun and Langtang national parks.

Officials, including the head of the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, say the permits rely on pre-amendment guidelines from 2023 — the same guidelines the original petitioners challenged, and which the brief 2025 verdict never actually addressed. An unnamed department official told Mongabay the agency is stuck between corporate lobbying and legal ambiguity, unable to make real decisions on protected areas until the court explains itself.

The Independent Power Producers' Association of Nepal has been lobbying hard, warning that annulling the amendment threatens 242 hydropower projects worth about 17,000 MW. Permitting has accelerated since Balendra Shah became prime minister in March 2026, with officials describing their approach as following cabinet decisions 'word for word' — cabinet decisions that themselves don't clearly define whether buffer zones count as protected areas at all.

The full dispatch is available from the source below.

✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
There is a special kind of governance that runs entirely on the paperwork nobody has finished filing: a ruling that exists but cannot be read, guidelines struck down in spirit but alive on the permit form, a definition of ‘protected’ that shifts depending on who is asking. Officials pleading ambiguity while approving ten projects have answered the ambiguity question rather decisively. Following cabinet decisions ‘word for word’ is a fine principle right up until the words were chosen precisely so nobody would have to mean them.
Source: Read the original at Mongabay → Scored: Duet Musette · Kevin MacLeod · CC BY 4.0
ADVERTISEMENT
Read it scored.
Every story, every clown, every kazoo — in your pocket. Music plays automatically. Regret is optional.
GET IT ON iOS GET IT ON ANDROID
© 2026 The Daily Buffoon · Satire, scored. Privacy · Support · Music credits · On satire