YOUR AD HERE — REACH DISCERNING READERS OF SERIOUS JOURNALISM
Rates upon inquiry. Clowns extra.
COURTS✒ EDITORIALABSURDITY:
Secrets
Filed 9h ago · Via Courthouse News · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Olde Timey
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Phillip Pessar · CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
New York's Appellate Division ruled that the Office of Court Administration must turn over internal memos offering legal guidance to judges, ending roughly five years of litigation over documents whose contents remain officially unknown. The column's author offers a satirical guess at what such guidance might contain, from gift etiquette to dress codes, none of it sourced to the actual memos.
Separately, a North Carolina federal judge's opinion describes a loan foreclosure case whose Second Amended Complaint ran 166 pages and 965 paragraphs, with claims nested inside claims inside claims across roughly 50 sub-causes of action. The judge dismissed the case without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of an even more elaborate refiling.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.
✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
Five years of legal fighting just to find out what's written in a memo tells you plenty about how badly somebody wanted it kept quiet, whether or not the contents turn out to be dull as dishwater. And a 965-paragraph complaint over a loan foreclosure is the kind of thing that makes you wonder if the point was ever to win, rather than just to bury the other side in paper until they give up first. Courts keep secrets and lawyers keep padding, and neither habit seems to be going anywhere soon.