YOUR AD HERE — REACH DISCERNING READERS OF SERIOUS JOURNALISM
Rates upon inquiry. Clowns extra.
COURTS✒ EDITORIALABSURDITY:
Mammoth Hockey bagmaker asks 10th Circuit to block Utah team from selling bags under same name
Filed 57m ago · Via Courthouse News · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Evil Plan
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Muhammad Mujib Uddin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
Attorneys for Utah Mammoth defended the team's name before the 10th Circuit, arguing multiple third parties already use 'mammoth' commercially, from sports teams to bagmakers. The team adopted the name in May 2025 after its first choice, Yeti, risked a trademark fight with the cooler company.
Mammoth Hockey, a Portland bagmaker selling bags priced above $300, sent a cease-and-desist letter after Utah Mammoth began selling bags priced $83 to $199 along with jerseys, hats, and other merchandise. A district judge denied Mammoth Hockey's injunction request in December, prompting the appeal.
Mammoth Hockey's attorney argued the case involves 'reverse confusion,' where a bigger, richer entrant drowns out a smaller established user, and said the district court never examined whether Utah Mammoth acted in bad faith. The panel did not indicate when it would rule.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.
✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
A bagmaker going up against a professional hockey franchise over a shared name is about as even a fight as a garden hose against a fire truck. The team says plenty of people use the word mammoth, which is true, though most of them aren't trying to sell bags in the exact same stores. Whatever the judges decide, the smaller outfit has already made its point just by getting a hearing.