YOUR AD HERE — REACH DISCERNING READERS OF SERIOUS JOURNALISM
Rates upon inquiry. Clowns extra.
TARIFFS✒ EDITORIALABSURDITY:
Coxon’s AI Warning Is Mainstream. Now What?
Filed 1h ago · Via Forbes · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Look Busy
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Olga Ernst · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
A Forbes contributor uses departed AI researcher Jacob Coxon's warning about the power of AI technology as a springboard for a lengthy meditation on whether artificial intelligence needs constitutional-style checks, comparing it to kings and empires who insisted their power was safe.
The essay argues that the real question isn't whether AI is safe but who has legitimate authority to define, exercise, and judge algorithmic power, framing this as legislative, executive, and judicial questions nobody is asking.
No new reporting or facts are offered beyond the framing; the piece is analysis built entirely on quotation and historical analogy.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.
✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
You can dress up a warning in a toga of history and it still boils down to the same worry everybody's had for decades: something powerful got built and nobody's quite in charge of it. Citing every big name from Turing to a Will Smith movie doesn't make the checks and balances appear any faster. If the answer really is 'separate the power before it gets absolute,' somebody ought to try writing that down as a rule instead of an essay.