AI Prefers AI-Generated Content So Game Those Ubiquitous AI Assessments By Having AI Write Your Materials If You Dare

Filed 2d ago · Via Forbes · The Buffoon Desk

THIS STORY IS SCORED

Mister Exposition

Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0

Photo: Michael Garlick · CC BY-SA 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

Forbes reports that organizations increasingly use AI to screen resumes, research papers, and award submissions, and that studies show these AI graders systematically score AI-generated text higher than human-written text.

The upshot: applicants who hand-craft their materials risk losing to those who simply had a chatbot do it, while detection tools meant to catch AI use remain unreliable and can misfire on writers gaming the system.

The piece frames this as an ethical dilemma facing submitters, though the more obvious dilemma belongs to the organizations that outsourced judgment to software trained to like itself.

The full dispatch is available from the source below.

✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK

There is something almost touching about an institution that automated away the part of hiring where a person reads a sentence, then acted surprised when the machine developed a taste for its own cooking. The word for a screening system that reliably prefers the applicants who did not bother is not “efficient,” it is “broken,” and everyone involved knows it. What is being tested here is not the candidates; it is whether anyone in the building will admit the emperor sent his resume by chatbot too.

Source: Read the original at Forbes → Scored: Mister Exposition · Kevin MacLeod · CC BY 4.0

Read it scored.

Every story, every clown, every kazoo — in your pocket. Music plays automatically. Regret is optional.

GET IT ON iOS GET IT ON ANDROID