YOUR AD HERE — REACH DISCERNING READERS OF SERIOUS JOURNALISM
Rates upon inquiry. Clowns extra.
COURTS✒ EDITORIALABSURDITY:
Actress suffers early setback in lawsuit over use of face in ‘Avatar’
Filed 35m ago · Via Courthouse News · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Funky Boxstep
Kevin MacLeod · incompetech.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Philcomanforterie · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
A federal judge in Los Angeles dismissed Q'orianka Kilcher's false endorsement claim against James Cameron and Disney over the design of Neytiri in 'Avatar,' though he let her amend the complaint. U.S. District Judge Wesley Hsu ruled that nothing in the films explicitly claims Kilcher endorsed or was affiliated with the project, which the Rogers test requires for such claims to survive.
Kilcher's attorney countered that Cameron himself conceded using her facial geometry, pointing to a 2005 sketch based on a photo of her as Pocahontas. Cameron's own account complicates that narrative, however, since he also said the character 'suddenly looked like Zoe' once Saldana was cast.
The judge postponed ruling on the defendants' anti-SLAPP motion and on whether to keep state law claims alive. Cameron met Kilcher in 2010, a year after the film's release, and gave her the sketch with a note calling her an early inspiration.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.
✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
A man can call a photograph his inspiration and still not owe anybody a check for it, at least not under this particular law. The court isn't saying nothing happened, it's saying the movie never stood up and announced it happened, which is a pretty thin needle to thread after a $3 billion opening weekend. Sixteen years between the sketch and the lawsuit is long enough that even a very patient neighbor would start asking what took so long.