An athletic trainer writing for an NCAA Division I program argues that recovery gear like compression boots, smart rings, massage guns, and ice baths are marketed to recreational exercisers on the strength of elite-athlete use, even though the evidence for meaningful benefit is often thin or narrow. Compression boots may modestly reduce perceived soreness and massage guns may improve short-term stiffness, but broader recovery or performance claims, including for electrical stimulation, hold up less well.
The piece notes creatine and added protein have real evidence behind them for people doing resistance training, while many other supplements sold alongside them do not. Wearable readiness scores, meanwhile, combine imprecise measurements into a number that can look more authoritative than it is, and the author suggests treating it as one input rather than a verdict.
The full dispatch is available from the source below.