VOL. I · NO. 8572THURSDAY, AUGUST 20, 2026
The Daily Buffoon
CULTURE ✒ EDITORIAL ABSURDITY: 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Is it illegal for the president to spend ‘patriotic’ donations on a White House ballroom or anything else?

Filed 6d ago · Via The Conversation · The Buffoon Desk
THIS STORY IS SCORED
Medieval Loop One
Alexander Nakarada · creatorchords.com · CC BY 4.0
Photo: Scan by Yellow Lion · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

A federal appeals court left in place an injunction halting construction on Trump's roughly $400 million White House ballroom, rejecting the administration's argument that private donations substitute for congressional authorization. The court found that while the National Park Service can accept donations for preserving structures like the demolished East Wing, building something new requires Congress's explicit approval, which the administration hasn't obtained.

The majority opinion noted a statute barring new structures on federal grounds in Washington without congressional authority, and pointedly observed it knew of no prior instance of a president unilaterally demolishing taxpayer-funded portions of the White House using private money — 'until now.' An underground bunker renovation begun after the East Wing's October demolition was not blocked by the ruling.

The full dispatch is available from the source below.

✒ FROM THE EDITORIAL DESK
Donating to the government to fund a pet project you couldn't get Congress to approve is not patriotism, it's a workaround with a flag pinned to it. The court's driest line — 'until now' — does more editorializing than most op-eds manage.
Source: Read the original at The Conversation → Scored: Medieval Loop One · Alexander Nakarada · CC BY 4.0
ADVERTISEMENT
Read it scored.
Every story, every clown, every kazoo — in your pocket. Music plays automatically. Regret is optional.
GET IT ON iOS GET IT ON ANDROID
© 2026 The Daily Buffoon · Satire, scored. Privacy · Support · Music credits · On satire